News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Apple’s “Expanded Protections for Children” – A Person... by Croftengea on Friday August 06, 2021 @05:18AM (#28084886)
"On device scanning" and "only if you use iCloud photos" doesn't make any sense does it? If it's really the case they're just preparing the ground for the next step which they hope won't get as much publicity...
Re:On Apple’s “Expanded Protections for Children” – A Person... by samrolken on Friday August 06, 2021 @05:46AM (#28085058)
Microsoft and Google hash your unencrypted photos on their own servers. Apple could easily do the same… I wonder why they didn’t…
Re:On Apple’s “Expanded Protections for Children” – A Person... by tzs on Friday August 06, 2021 @07:24AM (#28085648)
Probably because they are also adding a feature to parental controls which when enabled checks images sent to the phones of your children 13 and under and if the image matches a known bad image they give the child the option to accept it or not, warning the child that if they elect to accept it their parents will be notified and given a copy of the image.

That has to be done on the phone because Messages is end-to-end encrypted. If they are going to have to have hash matching on the phone anyway for that, it makes sense to also use that for checking images that are to be sent to the cloud.

Re:On Apple’s “Expanded Protections for Children” – A Person... by samrolken on Friday August 06, 2021 @08:57AM (#28086498)
The detection of sexual images in kids’ messages doesn’t use the same hashing setup as the iCloud Photos detection feature.