News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Expanded Protections for Children by aaomidi on Friday August 06, 2021 @12:27AM (#28083314)
Apple doesn't go and check every application thats being signed basically. The idea is that all applications get signed but if apple notices something it can revoke them and basically make them unusable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Certificate_Status_Prot...

They're just following basic pki. Again, Firefox does this with https certs. The CA knows who went to what website.

Re:Expanded Protections for Children by revolvingocelot on Friday August 06, 2021 @11:18AM (#28088329)
>Apple doesn't go and check every application thats being signed basically

...uh, then how did the failure of the auth server mean that nothing (except Apple apps) could run? My understanding was that the auth server checked the hash of every application that was being run, and the absence of that auth server meant nothing could run.

Moreover, I don't care about the fact that they're just using plain ol' certs, just like Firefox. They could be using screen recording software and Mechanical Turk to decide whether users can execute some third-party software -- the point is that they are deciding whether users can execute some third-party software. The technical implementation is unimportant, it's a bad thing.