Re:SAML Is Insecure by Design
by bawolff on Thursday August 05, 2021 @05:59PM
(#28080544)
> The people who wrote the XML signature standard didn't just take an XML document and whack a PGP signature around the whole thing! They thought about use cases like 'what if you wanted to only sign part of a document' and 'what if, after signing, the document was processed by something that reordered the attributes' and 'what if you have signatures from multiple sources and want to collate them into the same document'. They decided they wanted to support all of them.
You forgot to add the part - what if someone wants to add comments randomly without it changing the signature, even when those comments (mildly) change how the xml doc is parsed!
You forgot to add the part - what if someone wants to add comments randomly without it changing the signature, even when those comments (mildly) change how the xml doc is parsed!