News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Officials put the wrong man in a mental facility for two ... by philwelch on Thursday August 05, 2021 @04:48PM (#28079570)
This conspiracy theory doesn't really check out. Private prisons exist, but only account for 8% of the US prison population. There's probably a larger vested interest from corrections officer unions than from private prison contractors.

Regardless, there isn't even a need to find some shadowy special interest to explain the high incarceration rates in the US, when the laws that led to those high incarceration rates were passed very publicly for very straightforward reasons: to curb the late-20th-century crime wave of the 1970's-1990's. This was a major, high-profile political issue, and the majority of voters at the time favored "tough-on-crime" measures that led to mandatory sentences, longer sentences, three-strikes laws, and fewer judicial prerogatives. That's why they elected the people who promised to pass those laws before getting elected and kept those promises after being elected. And just like every other well-intended law that's ever been passed, there were unintended consequences that we can and should fix.

Re:Officials put the wrong man in a mental facility for two ... by sjtindell on Friday August 06, 2021 @04:34AM (#28084606)
It’s also intentional in that penitentiaries and prisons from the start in America were an incredibly racist endeavor. As was the response to the “crime waves” of that time period you mentioned. The early prisons, both private and public, were a Protestant method of punishment involving hard labor to cleanse you of your sins. But they were quickly co-opted as a way to make money, whether by labor for the prison itself or by the state leasing convicts to corporations. And after slavery as a way to keep African American people enslaved. If you’ve never seen documentaries on Angola, it’s horrifying the direct lineage of racism visible. Lines of black men in chains, in fields, picking cotton, under the watch of white guards on horseback…in the year 1960 and beyond. Wardens who had property on the plantation prisons of Arkansas and used black prisoners who weren’t in the fields as “house boys”. That’s always been and is today one intentional use for prisons.
Re:Officials put the wrong man in a mental facility for two ... by gentleman11 on Friday August 06, 2021 @01:54AM (#28083771)
The USA also has 22% of all prisoners globally
Re:Officials put the wrong man in a mental facility for two ... by skinnymuch on Friday August 06, 2021 @09:33AM (#28086924)
I don’t believe these were ever that well intentioned. Race and socioeconomic status was not something unseen and unknown to the politicians, voters, and every one else involved.

There’s a reason some one people like Bernie Sanders were against the 1992 crime bill. Which many republicans and democrats were for. To say the people for it were well intentioned when Bernie and others were telling them of the consequences and having already seen the negative consequences up to that point shows these were not unintended and not well intentioned.

Re:Officials put the wrong man in a mental facility for two ... by philwelch on Friday August 06, 2021 @01:12PM (#28090101)
Race is usually invoked as a thought-terminating cliche these days. It might interest you to know that a lot of black people also supported the crime bill because black communities were among those most victimized by crime.
Re:Officials put the wrong man in a mental facility for two ... by skinnymuch on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @07:46PM (#28136234)
You have found a new way to spin the classic “only racists talk about race”. Also added in a “usually”.

It can interest me when parts of a [sub]group do something. However it doesn’t have to mean anything too concrete or logical or line up so perfectly and neatly as your last sentence states.