Re:A bad grade that changed the U.S. constitution (2017)
by eigen on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @11:56PM
(#28069702)
> he always held that there is a process for changing the Constitution.
during the time Scalia was on the US Supreme Court (1986-2016), there was 1 amendment to the US constitution (27th) that was took 202 years for approvals. since I don't think he could be considered naive, it is almost certain he was disingenuous.
Re:A bad grade that changed the U.S. constitution (2017)
by jack_h on Thursday August 05, 2021 @09:50AM
(#28073718)
Why would he 'almost certain[ly]' be disingenuous? He stated in at least one interview that he believed the amendment process was too onerous in its requirements.
during the time Scalia was on the US Supreme Court (1986-2016), there was 1 amendment to the US constitution (27th) that was took 202 years for approvals. since I don't think he could be considered naive, it is almost certain he was disingenuous.