Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older?
by jinushaun on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @08:38AM
(#2807021)
There's a great TED talk a few years ago on this. We have the technnology and know-how to significantly increase life expectancy and to do research to make it even better, but why don't we? Curing cancer and Alzheimer's is not the same thing. Why don't we explicitly research life extension? The speaker brought up several philosophical, political and economic reasons why society has chosen to ignore the problem. There are a lot of unforeseen implications to a world where everyone lives past 150.
Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older?
by tokenadult on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @10:25AM
(#2807430)
We have the technnology and know-how to significantly increase life expectancy and to do research to make it even better
For what value of "significantly"? And at what cost, in a world in which many people live on five dollars a day or less?
Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older?
by drzaiusapelord on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @04:41PM
(#2809401)
I'm not sure why that makes any difference. The level of medical care I can get (and have gotten) as a middle class American blows away what these people can get now. The disparity is so huge that adding 100 years to my life barely makes a dent in the disparity.
More importantly, we need people to care, and for some insane reason people don't. How do we manage to not treat this as pretty much the most important unsolved problem in humanity? (Mostly, I suspect, due to a combination of perceived futility and ingrained cultural problems.)