News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are dynamic languages going to replace static languages? ... by NtrllyIntrstd on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @02:52AM (#28058020)
While I agree with most of what you said, the things you mentioned are more about type inference and good naming than static vs dynamic typing. (While you definitely shouldn't) You can, for example, write Haskell without ever naming a single type.

Considering the use of features like auto, I personally prefer writing unspecified variables while programming and getting the statically inferred types live from the IDE, which for example aids when composing a complicated expression whose type I don't fully know while writing.

There are no comments on this comment yet.