Re:Bradley Horowitz on Google+ naming policy
by rglullis on Monday July 25, 2011 @10:54PM
(#2805771)
What kind of support is that, when it can only be provided by a service that is not even one month old? The way you put it, it makes it sound as the only possible way for people to reach out privately to others in their trusted circle is through their computers/smartphones.
The OP is right. If privacy/concern of safety is so important to some people, they should re-evaluate their need for this product.
Re:Bradley Horowitz on Google+ naming policy
by saurik on Monday July 25, 2011 @10:57PM
(#2805780)
The OP has made a general claim about /all social networks/, not just G+. In some cases his sentences specifically state "Google+", but none of the arguments are Google+ specific, and his comment ends with an explicitly general recommendation.
The OP is right. If privacy/concern of safety is so important to some people, they should re-evaluate their need for this product.