The article you link discusses a legal case. It isn't a finding in research of glyphosate being a carcinogen. Indeed the article describes this fact in the very last paragraph.
I'm not sure what facts you expect me to glean from this piece but there are none supporting glyphosate as a carcinogen.
>Its one of the reasons Monsanto merged with Bayer - to "cleanse" the name of the fact that glyphosate is liquid cancer in a bottle.
>Jeasus christ, before you try to shut something down, know your facts:
>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-monsanto-cancer-lawsuit-i...
The article you link discusses a legal case. It isn't a finding in research of glyphosate being a carcinogen. Indeed the article describes this fact in the very last paragraph.
I'm not sure what facts you expect me to glean from this piece but there are none supporting glyphosate as a carcinogen.
>Its one of the reasons Monsanto merged with Bayer - to "cleanse" the name of the fact that glyphosate is liquid cancer in a bottle.
This is hyperbole.