Re:Why don't tech companies pay their engineers to stay?
by pxue on Tuesday August 03, 2021 @01:52PM
(#28052056)
Output/performance shouldn't be determined by pay, ie pay is a lagging indicator of output/performance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why don't tech companies pay their engineers to stay?
by b3morales on Tuesday August 03, 2021 @01:58PM
(#28052120)
My experience has been that if it lags far enough, output starts dropping to realign with it.
Re:Why don't tech companies pay their engineers to stay?
by arp242 on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @07:25AM
(#28059713)
Especially in cases where people are being underpaid by quite a bit, it can be a hugely demotivational factor. It's not even about the money as such, but rather about the signal how much all your hard work and effort is appreciated: apparently not all that much if you're not being paid what you know you're worth.
I really don't care all that much about how I'm being paid, I'm pretty easy about it. But it nonetheless played a direct factor in quitting two jobs because I felt I was being woefully underpaid (which I objectively was; although I guess you'll have to my word for it) and efforts to bring it up to a more standard level were being frustrated to such a degree I felt that a lot of "extra effort" I had put in to the job just wasn't being appreciated at all.
Re:Why don't tech companies pay their engineers to stay?
by throwawaysleep on Tuesday August 03, 2021 @02:23PM
(#28052382)
But pay determines whether I have a future at a company and if I have no future, my objective goes from getting a good performance review to avoiding termination.