News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Infrastructure bill cryptocurrency surveillance provision... by acdha on Tuesday August 03, 2021 @01:37PM (#28051928)
It's an always-on network transferring non-trivial amounts of data. Do you really think it's that hard to block port 8333 and a list of known hosts? No, it won't be perfect but if it's not easy to use with standard clients few people are going to deal with it — especially with the knowledge that less than perfect attempts to do so is publishing a clear sign of intent.

For a repressive government, that means that most people will steer clear which makes it easier to filter since you don't have a large volume of innocent traffic complicating analysis and by creating a great mechanism to get people to install spyware by circulating news underground of a great client which is preconfigured to evade the filter.

If this is your threat model, cash is much safer.

Re:Infrastructure bill cryptocurrency surveillance provision... by gruez on Tuesday August 03, 2021 @02:15PM (#28052285)
>It's an always-on network

you only need to be "on" to make transactions. In the case of sending transactions, you only need to broadcast the transaction itself (500 bytes), with no further traffic needed. The blockchain data is also broadcast via a satellite: https://www.blockstream.com/satellite/

>transferring non-trivial amounts of data

SPV clients require very little traffic, on the order of tens of kilobytes. Full nodes only need to download under 2MB worth every 10 minutes, or 3.33 KB/s. That's very easy to sneak under the radar if need be.

>Do you really think it's that hard to block port 8333 and a list of known hosts

good thing you can run bitcoin as a tor hidden service.

>If this is your threat model, cash is much safer.

Except you need to be in-person to make transactions.