Re:American Medical Association: Remove Sex from Public Birt...
by approxim8ion on Monday August 02, 2021 @02:04AM
(#28033365)
You mean the same Hou Yifan who said multiple times that she was speculating?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:American Medical Association: Remove Sex from Public Birt...
by goldenkey on Monday August 02, 2021 @02:31AM
(#28033496)
I'd trust the world champion of chess to not mention physicality as a possible reason unless it had merit. She's been playing chess her whole life.
Re:American Medical Association: Remove Sex from Public Birt...
by approxim8ion on Monday August 02, 2021 @02:39AM
(#28033541)
I'm not disagreeing with her opinion or negating her experiences, it's not my place. That said, classical (3h+) isn't the only form of chess, and it could be something that is personal to her and not representative of female players as a monolith.
Re:American Medical Association: Remove Sex from Public Birt...
by goldenkey on Monday August 02, 2021 @10:54AM
(#28037271)
Logically speaking, it's still a disadvantage even if it's one that matters less in some scenarios. Gender is highly predictive of a lot of biological statistics. Truly, we should be basing brackets on the biological stats themselves and make gender segregation a thing of the past. How will people react when the brackets reflect genetic potential rather than gender potential? Probably just as oppositional. People hate being told that someone else has a higher potential than them even if it's true. I don't blame them. But we can't live in a reality where we pretend that some aren't better built for certain endeavors.