News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i... by noahtallen on Monday August 02, 2021 @12:52AM (#28033023)
I think the counterpoint is that if in ten years most cars are electric, then that is not really a fair characterization. If electric cars and buses and trucks remain the most prevalent form of transit, then roads will continue to be very important, and that includes highways. There are plenty of safety projects that aren’t really about expansion, but about repairing, maintaining, and making better. (Or in this case, to get cars hidden away so they aren’t noisy and distracting in a historic site.)

(Aside, I also don’t like highways in cities.)

Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i... by adrianN on Monday August 02, 2021 @04:30AM (#28034227)
If we're very lucky in ten years most new cars sold will be electric. That is very different from most cars on the road being electric. It is also unlikely that the electric grid will be carbon free in ten years.
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i... by Ericson2314 on Monday August 02, 2021 @02:46AM (#28033586)
I've heard we have no idea how to recycle li-ion batteries, so the whole electric car thing is rather tenuous.
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i... by maccam94 on Monday August 02, 2021 @03:32AM (#28033865)
That's not true, electric vehicle batteries will have large quantities of valuable materials worth recycling, and companies are already working on this. https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/lithiumion-battery-recycling-f...