Re:Learning that you can use unions in C for grouping things...
by WalterBright on Sunday August 01, 2021 @11:28PM
(#28032575)
> the compiler won't delete it and complain if bar is not defined
will define it to the satisfaction of the compiler. The linker won't complain if the compiler removes the call to it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Learning that you can use unions in C for grouping things...
by shultays on Monday August 02, 2021 @05:27AM
(#28034565)
And then you have the issue of not having types. consider this
void my_bar_class_type::bar(my_bar_type<my_bar_type_2>::my_bar_inside_type paramater);
and you are calling something like myObject->bar(mySecondObject.getWhatever());
You have to mock up like everything
Re:Learning that you can use unions in C for grouping things...
by WalterBright on Monday August 02, 2021 @02:05PM
(#28040371)
Or go up an abstraction layer so the type details are not needed.