Re:A note to Google recruiters (and on Google hiring practices)
by wpietri on Monday July 25, 2011 @09:35AM
(#2802529)
I love that you'd rather be precise but wrong than imprecise but correct.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A note to Google recruiters (and on Google hiring practices)
by redthrowaway on Monday July 25, 2011 @10:28AM
(#2802734)
I'm fine with a solution that is elegant and works perfectly well 95% of the time, rather than one which is clumsy and works sort of well 100% of the time.
Re:A note to Google recruiters (and on Google hiring practices)
by wpietri on Monday July 25, 2011 @11:43AM
(#2803042)
I also love that you think reinforcing biases and helping to keep women out of the field qualifies as working "perfectly well". Perfectly well for you, I guess.
Say, I've noticed that most of the time when somebody argues vigorously in favor of some sexist behavior, they're a misogynist asshole. I'm sure you won't mind if I assume that describes you as well, right?
Re:A note to Google recruiters (and on Google hiring practices)
by redthrowaway on Monday July 25, 2011 @07:00PM
(#2805110)
Feel free to believe whatever you want; I long ago learned not to argue with fanatics on the internet.