Do we need a Scrum Master forever?

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by mokarma on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:29PM (#28010272)

One of the few places in tech where using the word "master" is cool. It's not entirely clear why.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by codyb on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:31PM (#28010301)

Scrum trunk doesn't have the same ring to it I suppose.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by jedberg on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:31PM (#28010291)

Because it means "mastery of the subject matter" and not "master of other people/things".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by ekster on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:48PM (#28010459)

This is not how your typical scrum master interprets it. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by g051051 on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:37PM (#28010372)

I see it actually interpreted (by scrum "masters") as "master of the scrum teams".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by rs999gti on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:38PM (#28010386)

master/slave for drives?

master for main branch?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Do we need a Scrum Master forever? by mberning on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:34PM (#28010324)

Masters have slaves. Which is exactly how workplaces implementing scrum view developers. Slave to the business and really the lowest level worker ant.

[ Parent | on HN ]