How to Avoid Repeating the Debacle That Was the Space Shuttle

Re:How to Avoid Repeating the Debacle That Was the Space Shu... by cpr on Sunday July 24, 2011 @08:58PM (#2800860)

Amen!

Though how we could ever expect federal government programs be efficient and cost-effective is beyond me, when the work is being done by the governmental agency itself.

We're much better at using governmental funds (which I still think are taken largely by theft) via agencies like DARPA, which operate through private industry and the educational establishments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How to Avoid Repeating the Debacle That Was the Space Shu... by nostromo on Sunday July 24, 2011 @09:24PM (#2800916)

NASA does work with private industry and educational establishments. In fact Lockheed Martin manufactured many components on the Space Shuttle and will be building its replacement as well. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5748366

I don't share your faith that this is a recipe for efficiency, as both Boeing and Lockheed regularly lobby congress for wasteful spending (however, usually for defense, not NASA).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How to Avoid Repeating the Debacle That Was the Space Shu... by econgeeker on Sunday July 24, 2011 @09:48PM (#2800965)

I think the gap between your perspectives comes from the existence of lobbying and the bid process not being open. Further, there is less competition because the previous control over the entire industry that NASA enjoyed prevented many possible competitors to LM or Boeing from getting off the ground.

Of course there is a wide array of subcontractors involved in NASA projects. I don't think anyone who accuses NASA of being inefficient thinks that NASA workers do all the manufacturing, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]