Re:Mining firm Rio Tinto sorry for destroying Aboriginal cav...
by AlotOfReading on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:07PM
(#27989067)
In most western countries (especially the US and UK where I have experience), there is a thriving private archaeology industry. Perhaps that's not true in your country, but it's a pretty unfair dismissal regardless.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mining firm Rio Tinto sorry for destroying Aboriginal cav...
by unpopulropnions on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:20PM
(#27989212)
I wrote "Most archaelogists", not all. Among the professionals, is that untrue or less than fair? If archaeology is predominantly a private industry I do need to update my priors.
Re:Mining firm Rio Tinto sorry for destroying Aboriginal cav...
by AlotOfReading on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:48PM
(#27989520)
Yes, the largest sector by far is private. There aren't many publicly funded jobs (annually it's measured in low 3 digits) and the competition for them is fierce. Either way, the ethics are similar.
I don't intend to be dismissive in saying this, but the arguments that you're making are wildly off-base about the underlying subject. Moreover, archaeology for the sole purpose of increasing commercial value violates strong ethical norms.
Re:Mining firm Rio Tinto sorry for destroying Aboriginal cav...
by lupire on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:46PM
(#27989492)
Lara Croft?
Re:Mining firm Rio Tinto sorry for destroying Aboriginal cav...
by AlotOfReading on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:53PM
(#27989564)
Sadly much more boring. It's mostly the result of heritage laws that require archaeological experts to be involved in construction/development projects under certain conditions. We're usually involved as private contractors either in looking for things before/during construction or rescuing found sites.