I did not say any job, I said "a" job. Yes vaccinations will protect other people. Banning alcohol would protect many people, but its a violation of a person's rights to ban it.
Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines
by TulliusCicero on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @02:49PM
(#27987970)
Okay, and? Yes, we don't have rules for every single possibly protective thing, but we do have rules for a lot of them.
Your line of reasoning could also be used against seat belt laws or building codes: why have those for public safety if we don't ban alcohol?
edit: also, while I don't support banning alcohol, it wouldn't be a violation of a person's basic rights to ban it. That used to be the law of the land in the US, and even today there are still some dry counties (alcohol cannot be sold).
>its a violation of a person's rights to ban it
It's literally not. Have you heard of the Prohibition?
Yes, and it was repealed by the 21st amendment. This was done because it is a violation of peoples' rights.
Since higher vaccination rates protect other people, I'm hopeful that vaccines become as mandatory as possible. That this bothers anti-vaxxers doesn't bother me, because why should it? I'm not more bothered by this than the vaccine requirement to enter public schools for kids.