Re:External IPv6 addresses for VM instances is now in Genera...
by jlokier on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @03:20PM
(#27988433)
Not disagreeing, but I'd like to mention a noticable proportion of IPv6 end users are behind CGNAT too. IPv6 doesn't remove CGNAT for everyone.
Re:External IPv6 addresses for VM instances is now in Genera...
by zekica on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @03:36PM
(#27988661)
I don't understand. There is no CGNAT in IPv6. You can do NPT (network prefix translation) if you really wanted, but why would you let users share the same IPv6 address/prefix as it is too much work (and not needed in any realistic setup).
Migrating popular traffic from CGNAT to IPv6 can also improve performance for some users, and reduce the long-term costs of CGNAT for ISPs.