Re:We should build for wildlife as well as people
by Someone on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @01:57PM
(#27987053)
https://www.mda.state.mn.us/business-dev-loans-grants/wolf-d...: “the 1977 Minnesota Legislature authorized the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) to reimburse livestock owners for losses caused by wolves”
Reading https://www.minnpost.com/environment/2020/02/heres-how-much-..., that gets around 100 claims per year, for a payout of about $100,000.
The EU has a similar program (https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46153727)
Re:We should build for wildlife as well as people
by WalterBright on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @02:09PM
(#27987300)
Sounds like a good program.
In Washington State, the newspaper articles on it always present it as one of:
1. the state sends out the helicopters and gunmen
2. the rancher eats the cost of the dead cows
Re:We should build for wildlife as well as people
by Someone on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @02:38PM
(#27987799)
And yet, there’s https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/at-risk/species-recover....
I wouldn’t know whether that compensation is fair or how bureaucratic the procedure is.
Re:We should build for wildlife as well as people
by at_a_remove on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:55PM
(#27989584)
I wonder how vulnerable that is to the Cobra Effect.
Re:We should build for wildlife as well as people
by WalterBright on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @11:35PM
(#27992519)
Any and all government payment programs are vulnerable to that.
It's an appropriate use of tax money.