News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Against Persuasion by mistermann on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @01:17PM (#27986305)
> You have a baseline and studies have shown it seldom changes much over your life.

Not all that long ago the very same thing could be said about a wide variety of things that we now take for granted/baseline, like basic competency in reading, writing, and arithmetic as one example. Unlike those things, thinking to a certain degree of competency is innate in human beings, but exceptionally skillful thinking in things like logic and epistemology must be learned...but for people to learn them, they must be taught. As it is, numerous errors can be easily found even in intellectual spaces online, demonstrating that even the cream of the crop is far from perfect....and as for the less intellectual places (the overwhelming majority), well we're all familiar with how bad those are.

Re:Against Persuasion by webmaven on Thursday July 29, 2021 @09:17AM (#27996154)
>> You have a baseline and studies have shown it seldom changes much over your life.

> Not all that long ago the very same thing could be said about a wide variety of things that we now take for granted/baseline, like basic competency in reading, writing, and arithmetic as one example. Unlike those things, thinking to a certain degree of competency is innate in human beings

You seem to be conflating openness to persuasion as a component of personality, and openness as a learnable mental skill.

It isn't inconsistent to assert that being open to persuasion is in fact both.

Re:Against Persuasion by mistermann on Thursday July 29, 2021 @09:57AM (#27996600)
It's not that I'm conflating them (I completely agree, there is surely some(!) unknown(!) base maximum capability per individual), but I am more so challenging this intuition/"epistemically unsound cultural axiom" that "openness" (or logic, or basically any cognitive ability) "is" essentially/largely immutable.

Most people I encounter find (heuristically) this belief/philosophy to be "wrong"/bizarre if not downright offensive, but I sincerely believe that this type of thinking (a bias towards conclusiveness and away from epistemic soundness and curiosity, and this is but one example among many) is one of the biggest root cause problems of problems on this planet. A prime example of where this is causing serious (life and death) problems is with vaccine hesitancy - people love to hate on anti-vaxxers, asserting that they "are" "stupid", but rarely have I encountered a "smart" critic who has the cognitive ability (openness) to even consider the possibility that their perception of the situation is incorrect (if not downright harmful from a causality perspective).

A (likely offensive, as a demonstration of my point) way to think about my stance/conceptualization that might help communicate my frustration: I feel as frustrated with pro-vaxxers (or, ~neurotypical ~Western human beings in general) as pro-vaxxers feel with anti-vaxxers...and ironically (or not), it seems at least as difficult to reason with them (which I believe well demonstrates the ubiquitous nature of the phenomenon).

Re:Against Persuasion by mensetmanusman on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @06:47PM (#27990742)
Half of studies have been shown to be non-repeatable though through p-hacking :) Maybe it’s all a dice roll.