Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by chetan_v on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @03:46PM
(#27976724)
"The contract of sale contains a confidentiality provision that protects information relating to the buyer and price." Wow that sucks, would have been quite interesting to know how the government found a buyer and how much it was sold for.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by arthurcolle on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @03:50PM
(#27976760)
It's probably some crypto loon who will turn around and make it an NFT
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by paulpauper on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @03:53PM
(#27976799)
and then 'sell' it for $70 million and no $ will change hands
[dead]
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by arthurcolle on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @09:49PM
(#27979583)
I am a crypto loon. There's literally dozens of us!
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by seriousquestion on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @03:57PM
(#27976846)
What would be the justification for making it private anyway? Shouldn't this be transparent?
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by PragmaticPulp on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @04:16PM
(#27977058)
To prevent the buyer from becoming a target for crime.
If people know who has it, they might try to extort him or worse.
I don’t see any reason the information needs to be public.
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by rchaud on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @04:24PM
(#27977146)
That would turn off a lot of buyers because it would bring undue attention. Buyers may not know the exact origin of stuff they're buying. A car for instance could formerly have belonged to a person you might not want to run into. A public record of that purchase however would make it a possible target not just for the original owner, but also any rivals he/she may have.
Re:United States sells Wu-Tang album forfeited by Martin Shk...
by Enginerrrd on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @04:14PM
(#27977040)
Well the notoriety of buying it didn't exactly help Shkreli's situation much, did it? If you want wealthy people to take an interest in buying it, it seems sensible.