News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Element raises $30M to boost Matrix by richardwhiuk on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @07:14AM (#27971054)
What do you mean by "kept with the original license"?
Re:Element raises $30M to boost Matrix by jcelerier on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @10:24AM (#27972806)
If you make a MIT project "Foo", not protected by a CLA and I contribute to it, then if your company uses Foo in a proprietary product they still have to give the attribution for my code as required by the MIT license, as my code will still remain MIT even if embedded in a larger non-MIT project.

OTOH if I had signed a CLA, then your company would be within its right to entirely strip any attribution to give whatever license they see fit to the code I wrote.

Re:Element raises $30M to boost Matrix by richardwhiuk on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @02:19PM (#27987471)
Yeah, they'll have to attribute the code to you - the MIT license will always apply - but they'll only need to attribute you - they can make as many modifications as they like.
Re:Element raises $30M to boost Matrix by pininja on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @09:28AM (#27972135)
The proprietary+forked code would become a mix of closed and open source license, but just never get released so you’d never be able to get ahold of it.