Re:Disinformation for hire, a shadow industry, is quietly bo...
by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Monday July 26, 2021 @12:07PM
(#27961166)
I read both for a while and consider WSJ more reliable and far far less sensationalist than NYT (as of maybe 5 years ago).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Disinformation for hire, a shadow industry, is quietly bo...
by colinmhayes on Monday July 26, 2021 @12:32PM
(#27961492)
I still read both and consider them two of the most reliable sources of domestic journalism. Their non editorial sections are of very similar qualities. Their editorial sections are both political hackery.
Re:Disinformation for hire, a shadow industry, is quietly bo...
by shanecleveland on Monday July 26, 2021 @01:40PM
(#27962451)
Agreed. I believe the lines between editorial and news has become (purposefully?) blurred, or at least many no longer recognize the difference. It can be interesting to see how headlines and emphasis on news stories in both publications can differ for the same topic, but they both follow a predictable standard. As you suggest, the editorial boards are echo chambers, but they both give time to opposing views there, as well.