News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Understanding Rust futures by going way too deep. Parent comment

Re:Understanding Rust futures by going way too deep by floatboth on Monday July 26, 2021 @10:29AM (#27959777)
SML doesn't have typeclasses/traits, so it's fair to say "Haskell" instead.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Understanding Rust futures by going way too deep by grumblenum on Monday July 26, 2021 @11:34AM (#27960712)
SML has signatures. In the absence of HKT, I think it's not a fair comparison. Most popular languages have interfaces even if not by that name. Haskell, Scala and C++ are special in that you can describe an interface for interfaces. I'm sure I'm not giving due credit to others.
[ Parent | on HN ]