News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Language records reveal a surge of cognitive distortions ... by wolverine876 on Monday July 26, 2021 @01:27AM (#27955997)
> this notorious "tabloid journal", as statistics professor Andrew Gelman calls them

One professor's statement (citation?) doesn't discredit the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science. I would need much more evidence than that. A snarky comment - a common means of discrediting institutions, a popular trend these days - costs nothing to make, and carries little evidence, reason, or meaning.

Re:Language records reveal a surge of cognitive distortions ... by dash2 on Monday July 26, 2021 @05:00AM (#27957225)
Andrew Gelman has provided plenty of evidence, though. I'd certainly say that PNAS, though it's a high quality journal, does sometimes go for "marketable" social science content over less shiny, but more substantive work.