>Who is they?
The 17 authors of the manifesto.
>But you would further impose problem solving constraints on others thought work.
I would, yes. I've worked with a diversity of methodologies and several times with no explicit methodology all and in a team context we ended up a disorganized mess.
You might try to accept the rest of us don’t jump through the hoops of having a financially thriving job for you.
It’s not to bring order to chaos. It’s to afford shelter, food, and healthcare.
Sorry, not sorry.
Perhaps you’d be happier living as a hermit, where you can organize as you wish; everything just so! without the rest of humanity, that does quite a bit of the heavy lifting for you, interfering.
Anarchy is no good.
Haha.
Your efforts are constrained by physical science, social objectives.
There’s plenty of structure to prevent anarchy.
But you would further impose problem solving constraints on others thought work.
Shit n hellfire; what a dumpster fire of a culture.
Would you say something as minimal as “E=mc^2” promotes anarchy? It hardly illustrates the full meaning of relativity.
Perhaps where you perceive emptiness and anarchy, others perceive correctness and order.
Like religion; one mans abstraction is another mans insanity.