News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Agile at 20: The Failed Rebellion by arendtio on Sunday July 25, 2021 @02:45AM (#27947275)
I think the fuss about the daily scrum is a perfect example of what is wrong with many Agile transformations.

Often it seems that people talk about the 'micromanagement' and 'wasted time' as if they would not enjoy the daily. To me this is a warning, that something within the setup is not right. In general, micromanagement requires hierarchy, but I don't recall from the Scrum Guide [1] that a manager should be present or that directions should be given. So who is managing who?

If done right, there should be absolutely no reason why there should be negative emotions involved: The devs get together and talk about their work and the challenges they want to share. It is about fostering communication.

[1] https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#daily-scrum

Re:Agile at 20: The Failed Rebellion by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday July 25, 2021 @02:54AM (#27947325)
> negative emotions involved

Because the daily standup can only be X minutes, someone always gets cut off, causing negative emotions.

Re:Agile at 20: The Failed Rebellion by pantalaimon on Sunday July 25, 2021 @04:36AM (#27947687)
I'd say the much more common negative emotion is when you didn't manage to get the work done you had planned to do/spending way too long on a task and having to justify that in front of the team.
Re:Agile at 20: The Failed Rebellion by teamonkey on Sunday July 25, 2021 @08:05AM (#27948546)
This smacks of a dysfunctional work environment, to be honest, and I don't think scrums are the problem.