Re:HiveNightmare a.k.a. SeriousSAM – anybody can read the re...
by Asooka on Saturday July 24, 2021 @09:41AM
(#27940861)
I am confused how having read access to the registry allows local privilege escalation. As a Linux user, having read access to the registry sounds like having read access to /etc, which every user already has. What sensitive data is stored in SAM that allows that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:HiveNightmare a.k.a. SeriousSAM – anybody can read the re...
by aj3 on Saturday July 24, 2021 @09:57AM
(#27940985)
Password hashes. /etc/shadow isn’t world readable in Linux dither
Re:HiveNightmare a.k.a. SeriousSAM – anybody can read the re...
by ylyn on Saturday July 24, 2021 @01:59PM
(#27943063)
It seems like there are some cases where Windows accepts a password hash for authentication as a user though. So by having the hash of an administrator, you can escalate privileges.
I don't think there are such cases in Linux.
Re:HiveNightmare a.k.a. SeriousSAM – anybody can read the re...
by cjones26 on Saturday July 24, 2021 @09:55AM
(#27940972)
Agreed. The article also does not seem to explain it. From what I understood the SAM only stores encrypted password hashes, nothing that could be readily exploited for local privilege escalation.
Re:HiveNightmare a.k.a. SeriousSAM – anybody can read the re...
by jesboat on Saturday July 24, 2021 @11:48AM
(#27941881)
There's a video (bleh) which appears to extract the hash and then use a pass-the-hash. I'm not clear on exactly what the preconditions are (are NTLMv1/v2 hashes still stored by default? Does PTH work with newer hashes? Etc) or if there's another way to escalate