News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Without Enough Water to Go Around, Farmers in California ... by inetknght on Saturday July 24, 2021 @01:26AM (#27938668)
> Eight bucks just for the water to draw a bath? No thanks.

That's the cost of living in a desert.

Re:Without Enough Water to Go Around, Farmers in California ... by whoknowswhat11 on Saturday July 24, 2021 @01:40AM (#27938747)
It’s a made up number - no one normal uses this much water in a bath
Re:Without Enough Water to Go Around, Farmers in California ... by admax88q on Saturday July 24, 2021 @01:56AM (#27938817)
They pretty clearly confused 0.25 cents with $0.25
Re:Without Enough Water to Go Around, Farmers in California ... by samatman on Saturday July 24, 2021 @02:01AM (#27938837)
Yep that's what happened.

In my defense, it's common "greengrocerese" to list a price that way. If limes are shown as "0.10¢ ea." on a handwritten card, you're not getting ten for a penny.

I still think taxing residential water is irrelevant, and that the difference between buying water at auction from the state and paying a tax for that water to the state, is that auction is better because price discovery tends to be.

Re:Without Enough Water to Go Around, Farmers in California ... by whoknowswhat11 on Sunday July 25, 2021 @12:21PM (#27950381)
The idea here is to set what appears to be a ridiculously low tax that applies to everyone. No carvouts so reduces arguments about fairness.

This highlight the large water uses (usually free in the millions of gallons).

If you aren't willing to say a gallon of water is worth a quarter of a penny - then we can usually stop talking about any supposed shortages. Retail / urban water use (ie, a bottle of water at the store, often 1/8th of a gallon - this tax is irrelevant obviously) already is wildly higher in cost than the "free" groundwater and river water folks are using.