Yes. It’s not what’s in the article but what it lacks; real criticism.

It does nothing to constructively challenge why we should let Bezos be in charge of saving the planet.

His billionaire adventures are doing quite a bit of damage to begin with, perpetuating shallow consumerism.

It neither denigrates nor deifies him. It’s a flaccid “both sides” emotional piece, leaving conclusions up to the reader.

Mine were that he’s part of the problem he’s trying to solve so why expect him to be anything else?

Bezos can’t escape being human and humans are destroying the planet.

I came to comment, not read