News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by SeanLuke on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:09PM (#27922286)
Now the "cicadas" and neurological damage are occurring near the White House.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/29/us-investigating-peculiar-at...

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/29/politics/us-investigating-mys...

I think it's looking more and more like an actual attack.

Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by jameshart on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:26PM (#27922480)
The common denominator here seems to be that it happens in secure US Government buildings. I have to wonder whether it’s related to the security technology itself, like some noise cancellation tech incorporated into the standard SCIF security system interferes badly with the ultrasound sensors of the intruder alarms to create these noise artifacts…
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by jonny_eh on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:30PM (#27922526)
From the article:

> We also found electronics stores that carry high- power ultrasonic jammers that cause microphones to malfunction

Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by gricardo99 on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:49PM (#27922726)
and:

  If a signal from that caliber jammer were to combine with a second ultrasonic source, audible by-products could result.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by BossingAround on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:21PM (#27922412)
Yes, still highly consistent, given [1].

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/05/brood-x-cica...

Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by eli on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:23PM (#27922449)
The alleged whitehouse incident was in november. I don't think it was an attack, but it wasn't cicadas.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by R0b0t1 on Thursday July 22, 2021 @05:07PM (#27924354)
... or someone is using correlation to make it look like cicadas.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by nomel on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:30PM (#27922527)
Just curious, why is this comment being heavily downvoted? edit: why was, since it's now back up
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by tablespoon on Thursday July 22, 2021 @03:56PM (#27923507)
> Just curious, why is this comment being heavily downvoted? edit: why was, since it's now back up

Some people weirdly seem to be really, really invested in "Havana syndrome" being psychosomatic/mass hysteria/US footgun/anything besides a deliberate attack.

Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by atkwarriors on Thursday July 22, 2021 @05:26PM (#27924537)
like hn poster's bizarre and honestly naive infatuation with the concept of covid-19 being escaped from a lab?

quit, it is embarrassing

Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by mc32 on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:11PM (#27922304)
Or countermeasure going haywire.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by mcguire on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:34PM (#27922557)
From the article:

"While the equipment we used in our Cuban re-creation is relatively bulky, ultrasonic emitters can be quite tiny, no larger than a piece of Rolo candy. Online, we found a manufacturer in Russia that sells a fashionable leather clutch that conceals an ultrasonic emitter, presumably to jam recording devices at cocktail parties. We also found electronics stores that carry high- power ultrasonic jammers that cause microphones to malfunction. One advertised jammer emits 120-dB ultrasonic interference at a distance of 1 meter. That’s like standing next to a chainsaw. If a signal from that caliber jammer were to combine with a second ultrasonic source, audible by-products could result."

Consider an countermeasure ultrasonic emitter intended to jam microphones in proximity to, say, a spy emitter using ultrasonic sound as a carrier wave for a microphone, as described in the article.

Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by eli on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:14PM (#27922344)
Or someone just had a bad headache. I don't think it's very likely that there's a secret energy weapon hidden in the bushes near the whitehouse.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by SeanLuke on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:13PM (#27922335)
Or countermeasure going haywire. At any rate, not cicadas.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by mc32 on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:17PM (#27922369)
Yes, that seems like an obvious dead end, if not decoy.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by tsimionescu on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:14PM (#27922340)
Yes, probably caused by those UFOs that everyone keeps talking about.

Much more plausibly, people in the US military and/or secret services are trying to invent trouble in the wake of recent relative peace.

[dead]
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by stnmtn on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:25PM (#27922458)
Did you reply to the right comment? Your comment is a complete non-sequitor
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack... by X6S1x6Okd1st on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:55PM (#27922777)
> the wake of recent relative peace.

Huh? January 6th was only ~6 months ago and the fall out from that continues.

Cyberwarfare continues to ramp up.