Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack...
by jlmorton on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:05PM
(#27922230)
It is. The linked article is from 2018, before it was determined the recordings were of crickets.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack...
by jjeaff on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:18PM
(#27922372)
But that doesn't explain the now hundreds of similar reports of illness and other side effects, usually reported after hearing the sound.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack...
by jonny_eh on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:29PM
(#27922512)
Mass hysteria combined with nocebo effect? Triggered by an encounter with cicada trapped in a hotel room.
Similar example, the Pokemon Panic of 1997: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Radford#Pok%C3%A9mon_...
A few legit cases of seizure triggered thousands of "false" cases.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack...
by fay59 on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:38PM
(#27922595)
These attacks are reported to have long-lasting consequences. That would be (I think?) incompatible with mass hysteria or nocebo effects.
Re:How We Reverse Engineered the Cuban “Sonic Weapon” Attack...
by jlmorton on Thursday July 22, 2021 @02:58PM
(#27922812)
Remarkably, after the recordings that preceded the illnesses were found to be crickets, everyone stopped reporting the cricket noise before the illness. Now, the American diplomats in Vienna report a new noise, a ringing in their ears, which apparently is not recorded.