I had it too, and every licensed medical authority of any kind I talked to still advised me to get the vaccine. I talk a lot of shit about the medical profession, but I'm not so deluded as to believe that my understanding of immunology is better than theirs.
Or if you want to be extra luddite (or like me, it was the only thing I could reasonably get) you can recommend Coronavac from Chinese lab Sinovac or Covaxin from Indian lab Bharat Biotech, which are as old-school as they come since they're using the deactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Also, that's not what autoimmune means.
Also, there were not "deaths of all animals" or even some; you can read about Pfizer's initial animal testing here: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.08.280818v1.... and the results here: https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download There's also a follow-up paper here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03275-y
Given that the CDC admits that since VAERS reporting is voluntary, only around 10% of incidents are likely reported, that should be enough evidence of "vaccine" danger to give anyone pause. Also, it's a travesty that CDC has flipped the usual "must be proven safe and effective" process on it's head to "has not yet established a causal link to the Covid-19 vaccines". (See last Friday's update at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/ad...)
Knowing that lets us do a little math about expected death rates. In 2019, ~58,000 Scots died over the course of the year; that gives a rough chance of dying on any given day of 0.002%.
As of today, about 3m Scots are fully vaccinated vaccine, and another ~1m have either received a single dose or are still within the 2 week period after the second dose. If you add up the 28 day periods after those doses, that gives 196m days of Scots living "within 28 days of taking the 'vaccine'". You would then expect ~5,700 of them to die even if given saline, just by the underlying death rate.
So 5,500 is actually a bit lower than expected, maybe due to residual lockdown effect, or perhaps just that people who get vaccinated are generally better at risk/benefit analysis and are less likely to die from all causes.
Can you post a source for the 5500 claim? For reference, we had around 5500 deaths in Scotland in total for 1 March - 4 April [1], so to get an extra months worth of deaths would be a big deal.
[1] https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/march-death-rate-lowest-f...
What they haven't done is adjust spacetime so that we know what the vaccine could potentially do - a year down the line? two years?
We literally do not know. At all. We can make educated guesses. At that point - I'd rather abstain from the jab for now at least until this flu season is over.
Feel free to judge me for my personal opinions but I'm not getting it yet. Too early for me. Let everyone else be the guinea pigs.