Re:A case against security nihilism
by 3gg on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @08:21PM
(#27900868)
Beat me to it. The macho effect is there for sure, but on what grounds do you claim you can write secure C? As far as I know, you can't really prove anything about C unless you severely restrict the language, and those restrictions include pointer usage. So at best, you can do a hand-wavy read through code and have some vague notion of its behaviour.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.