News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by mr_gibbins on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:10PM (#27900004)
No, I'm sorry, I'm not going to pull out heaps of regurgitated quantum information to back this up but that's straight-up wrong.

The red ball and the blue ball exist as physical objects, it is us, the observers, who are unaware of whether they are red or blue at either position. There's no superposition here. They are red, or blue, assigned randomly. Not both, not none. These are facts - properties - about the balls that are real, that exist, but we simply don't have that information at that point. It is meaningless that there is no observer that can 'see through' our hands to know which is correct.

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by ks1723 on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:32PM (#27900166)
Sorry, this is just wrong. Bell‘s inequality and the very related Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem [1] state that local hidden variables (one ball is blue, one is red, but we just don’t know it) are not consistent with QM.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kochen–Specker_theorem