Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i...
by feoren on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @05:34PM
(#27899665)
Sure, but the Copenhagen interpretation is basically rejected as absurdist and is unnecessary for the exact same reason. It's also trying to give a physical explanation for an artifact of one of the many mathematical representations of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger's Cat is a reductio ad-absurditum to disprove the Copenhagen interpretation!
The contention seems to be that the Copenhagen interpretation elevates wave function collapse from mathematical artifact to real phenomenon.