How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ is real

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by naasking on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @04:44PM (#27899057)

> The analogy you mentioned is exactly the wrong one - it suggest that it’s just a matter of a hidden variable.

It is equivalent to a hidden variable, just a non-local one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by kolinko on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @06:08AM (#27904312)

his analogy suggests there is a local hidden variable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by naasking on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @12:51PM (#27908737)

That too could be a valid analogy if "randomly grab one in each hand" isn't actually random, but only appears random. This would be analogous to superdeterminism.

[ Parent | on HN ]