How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ is real

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by 0majors on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @03:17PM (#27897968)

That’s right. Not only it’s an analogy, it is also a bad one and completely misleading, at least according to physics of the last 50 years. Note how the article frets about the loss of locality.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by normac2 on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:35PM (#27900186)

Hmn. Is that at least what we experience if we try it as an experiment (even if the underlying physics is quite different than what it seems)?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Bell’s Theorem proved ‘spooky action at a distance’ i... by Retric on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:59PM (#27900359)

The only thing we experience from preforming at an experiment is the data it provides. As such from the data from existing experiments is where all the spooky action at a distance is actually observed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test though none of them are quite definitive on their own https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loopholes_in_Bell_tests. I wouldn’t read much into the loopholes, but they do demonstrate just how difficult this stuff is.

[ Parent | on HN ]