>That’s not true at all. By far most gains were captured by the wealthy:
The problem with that analysis is that it implies a 1%/1% growth (for rich/poor respectively) is preferable to a 2%/6% growth.
> That’s not true at all.
What they said was technically/precisely true, despite not being particularly meaningful.
https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2021/07/net-worth-gains-in-2...
That’s not true at all. By far most gains were captured by the wealthy:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/23/how-much-wealth-top-1percent...