News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?. Parent comment

Re:Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until p... by wizzwizz4 on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @08:59AM (#27893176)
Zero data of the effects after three years. Plenty of data about the effects after one. It's not “reasoning without data”; it's reasoning without as much data as one would have liked.

Are you doing this on purpose?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until p... by adolph on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @07:46PM (#27900652)
The commenter did not say the results of one year were under consideration. They described a state of recommendation without information. Besides, March to July isn’t even half a year for phase 3 trials.

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04811664

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until p... by faeriechangling on Thursday July 22, 2021 @04:13AM (#27916613)
I did mention inferences.

You seem to be concerned that I don't maintain a state of complete agnosticism in any matter which I lack data for, but it's really hard to do so in practice in a world of distinct choices. Most everybody will either get vaccinated or not get vaccinated and at least have made an implicit prediction about the future. Since I was pressured into making that choice it seems hardly surprising that I'm willing to opine on this issue where I lack data.

[ Parent | on HN ]