News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ Beta Software Used on Public ... by rcMgD2BwE72F on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @05:33AM (#27891637)
Erratum: my grandpa drives worst than FSD with human oversight (like in all the video you can find on Youtube). I didn't meant FSD without oversight, which is not possible anyway. But are we discussing the current level of FSD as a Level 5 system? Don't think so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car#SAE_Classific...

Re:Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ Beta Software Used on Public ... by jacquesm on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @05:41AM (#27891697)
Then he should hand in his license.
Re:Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ Beta Software Used on Public ... by saiya-jin on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:20AM (#27891949)
why is it so hard to understand that roads full of drivers equal to your mythical grandpa would be a really bad idea and people would be dying left and right?
Re:Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ Beta Software Used on Public ... by 542354234235 on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @11:06AM (#27907309)
>my grandpa drives worst than FSD with human oversight

Your grandpa is one person. Retesting 100 million drivers to find the bottom 10% is not exactly very feasible. For a model of FSD, all vehicles on the road share the exact same level of performance. We are talking about scale here.

It is like comparing me selling some vegetables from my garden to a neighbor and a company selling 100 million units of vegetables across a country. It makes zero sense to say "they should both have the same level of safety standards", since a listeria outbreak sickening thousands is far worse than a tainted cucumber poisoning one neighbor.

Tens of thousands of cars using dangerously poor driving level software is worse than any one individual driver that may have dangerously poor skills.