News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Under the skin of OnlyFans by Kiro on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @02:38AM (#27890716)
It's debatable and not as clear cut. Many believe that a "liberation" of sexual content manifests the objectification of women and therefore is a net negative to society and the progress toward equality.
Re:Under the skin of OnlyFans by tinco on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @03:13AM (#27890878)
Sexual content and objectification of women have been widely spread on TV since the 70's. The content we consumed as teenagers has always been tinged with an air of exploitation.

Just think of most women's opinion of the majority of pornography, sure they could pick out some they like, but they find a lot of it disgusting. I can't imagine having to grow up with the feeling that the opposite sex is constantly consuming content that's exploitative of your sex.

At least most of these TikTok/OF creators have some level of dignity, and power over their own lives.

Re:Under the skin of OnlyFans by dannyw on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:24AM (#27891978)
Do you think Call of Duty manifests the acceptance of violence and is a net negative to society?

There's nothing that special about sex work. If you are a parent, teach your children to build respectful, healthy relationships.

Re:Under the skin of OnlyFans by Kiro on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @08:05AM (#27892733)
No, I don't think it's a net negative. I do however think objectification of women is since it amplifies one of the biggest issues of society for very little gain. The small negative impact Call of Duty has (if any) is minuscule in comparison.

> If you are a parent, teach your children to build respectful, healthy relationships.

If you actually think it's that easy you're minimizing the fight for equality and rights for all women.