News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deurbanising the Web [pdf] by ussrlongbow on Monday July 19, 2021 @11:53AM (#27883994)
Very surprised to see just few comments mentioning EPUB, which is IMO is much more suitable for document-centric approach. An open standard with freely available[1] specification and never had any problems with EPUBs on PC, tablets and phones.

[1] - https://www.w3.org/publishing/epub32/epub-spec.html#sec-intr...

Re:Deurbanising the Web [pdf] by shuntress on Monday July 19, 2021 @01:58PM (#27885453)
Also worth pointing out, EPUBs are (or, at least, can be. I'm not sure how much flexibility is in the specifications) basically just bundled HTML.
Re:Deurbanising the Web [pdf] by DerDangDerDang on Monday July 19, 2021 @12:12PM (#27884231)
There’s a fixed layout version of the ePub standard too, allowing PDF quality if that’s what you’re after.
Re:Deurbanising the Web [pdf] by kccqzy on Monday July 19, 2021 @02:35PM (#27885863)
But can you open an epub in a browser? That's the main point here.
Re:Deurbanising the Web [pdf] by spinax on Monday July 19, 2021 @05:21PM (#27887389)
Not only simple browser plugins per the other reply (and a plethora of non-crashing mobile apps, whereas mobile PDF reading apps crash on me all the time) - the ePub format is just a zip file in disguise with plain text (HTML) inside and maybe some images/etc.

In a manner of speaking, ePub as a design has an inherent built-in fallback mechanism to manually obtain the internal content in case of failure - including ability to try and repair a broken zip format (zip -F/-FF) and grep it in place (zipgrep).

Re:Deurbanising the Web [pdf] by ussrlongbow on Monday July 19, 2021 @03:33PM (#27886453)
Yes, but with the plugin