It's not their fault, the US and UK media gloss over the facts whenever they directly report on him, and references to him in editorials or stories about other events refer to the "beliefs" of authority figures and agencies, and the charges, but never directly to specific allegations, facts, or timelines.

People have no hope of having an accurate picture of events unless they invest a significant amount of time into something that will not benefit them.

Journalists at major outlets are more concerned about the Assange case than their papers, but still have zero chance of getting accurate stories published about it.