Re:Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids
by tqi on Sunday July 18, 2021 @09:03PM
(#27878186)
Also to be specific, none of the volunteers needed to consult an Oracle. The factors they cite (low N, "newsworthiness") are also the same factors that would give a layperson pause.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids
by h0l0cube on Sunday July 18, 2021 @09:24PM
(#27878293)
I think if we're invoking the reproducabilty crisis, it's a bit ironic to then dismiss demographics
Re:Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids
by tqi on Sunday July 18, 2021 @11:44PM
(#27879040)
No, not really.
The point is that it's possible to relibly predict whether a study will reproduce based solely on the characteristics of the study.
Re:Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids
by h0l0cube on Monday July 19, 2021 @12:13AM
(#27879184)
And a high portion of the cohort of that study were people that read academic papers as an occupation. I'm not saying that the study couldn't generalize to lay people, just that you haven't presented evidence of it
(I believe one of the early controversies that sparked the reproducability crisis was the discovery that an excess of studies were using college students as their participants, skewing their results)