Re:How many real numbers exist? New proof moves closer to an...
by ummonk on Sunday July 18, 2021 @05:45PM
(#27876981)
Upthread you said: "Of course if you tried that I could immediately name you a real number, or a pair of them, for which your rule doesn't work."
That is false - you're actually unable to name these numbers for which the rule doesn't work. Instead you're just insisting we accept on faith the existence of these unnamable numbers.
That is false - you're actually unable to name these numbers for which the rule doesn't work. Instead you're just insisting we accept on faith the existence of these unnamable numbers.