News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia cofounder: I no longer trust the website I created by gus_massa on Sunday July 18, 2021 @03:11PM (#27875634)
There are good journals with a strict vetting process and there are predatory journals where the "peer review" is just a rubber stamp iif you pay the publication fees. And there are many levels in between.

So in an Internet discussion, I try to use "published in a serious peer review journal". But it's very difficult to know if a journal is serious unless you are an specialist in that area.

There are indices that somewhat measure the quality, but for example a citation index or 1.5 is a lot in Math but low in Physics, so you don't know unless you are an specialist in the area.

There are tricks that are useful to detect bad journals, like looking at the rest of the articles published in the journal. A lot of single author articles is a red flag. Weird titles like "Using General relativity to prove that Sunspots are Conscious" is another red flag.

Re:Wikipedia cofounder: I no longer trust the website I created by forcry on Monday July 26, 2021 @06:53AM (#27957935)
>There are good journals with a strict vetting process

This is a myth. Vetting process cannot help if the persons involved are corrupt.

Getting a "good reputation" might be just the first step in the journey to corruption.