News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by Turing_Machine on Friday July 16, 2021 @04:27PM (#27860843)
Historically there were two modes of distribution, "publishers" and "common carriers".

Publishers (like newspapers) had full control over their content, and also had full responsibility for it (e.g., if they printed something libelous, they could be sued).

Common carriers (like the phone company) had no control over the content, and no responsibility for it, either (you couldn't sue the phone company if someone used the phone to plan a crime, for instance).

Google and their ilk want to have it both ways. They want the full control of publishers, and the zero responsibility of common carriers.

Historically, power without responsibility has invariably been a recipe for abuse.

I think they should have to choose one or the other.

Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by throwawaysea on Friday July 16, 2021 @05:39PM (#27861547)
This is the point SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas made in his render opinion, that communication networks like social media should be regulated as common carriers: https://reclaimthenet.org/justice-clarance-thomas-big-tech-p...
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by amanaplanacanal on Friday July 16, 2021 @07:40PM (#27862405)
That’s the way it was until the passage of the communications decency act. Early social networks found themselves in a bind in that if they tried to moderate for say, spam, or porn, or copyright infringement, they were then liable for everything their users published. The CDA was an attempt to solve that problem.

I don’t have a better answer.

Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by nobody_at_all on Friday July 16, 2021 @09:40PM (#27862955)
How can an endpoint, no matter how large that endpoint is, be considered to be a common carrier?

Justice Thomas is hardly a reliable source for making it so.

Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by Turing_Machine on Sunday July 18, 2021 @01:51PM (#27874886)
How is Facebook any more an "endpoint" than AT&T?
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by nobody_at_all on Friday July 23, 2021 @03:09PM (#27934455)
Facebook is just an endpoint on the internet. Nothing more.

AT&T is an ISP among other carrier things.

How can a server, or a set of servers be anything more than an endpoint?

That you would compare ATT and FB shows a remarkable misunderstanding of the internet and WWW.